PriMera Scientific Engineering (ISSN: 2834-2550)

Research Article

Volume 8 Issue 6

Does Generative AI Stifle Creativity? Convergence and Homogenisation in Student Work

Robin Vivian*

May 31, 2026

Abstract

Generative AI (GAI) has now been widely integrated into higher education. While its impact on cognitive abilities (cognitive offloading) has been well-documented, its influence on creativity is less well-understood. This study analysed 12 video game design projects created by 36 second-year computer science students using generative AI tools. Despite the creative power of the tools, the results reveal a strong thematic convergence, with 50-58% of projects set in post-apocalyptic worlds, 75-83% featuring male protagonists and conventional narrative structures. This article discusses the pedagogical implications of this finding and proposes ways to integrate GAI judiciously.

Keywords: generative AI; creativity; cognitive offloading; creative homogenisation; game design; higher education

References

  1. Alharthi SA., et al. “Generative AI in Game Design Education”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2025).
  2. Alghamdi AA., et al. “University students’ perceptions of generative AI”... Innovations in Education and Teaching International (2025).
  3. Doshi AR and Hauser OP. “Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content”. Science Advances 10.28 (2024): eadn5290.
  4. Espeso-García A. “Generative Artificial Intelligence: Between Enhancement and Cognitive Offloading”. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte 20.66 (2025).
  5. Gerlich M. “AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking”. Societies 15.1 (2025) 6.
  6. Habib S., et al. “How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creative thinking skills?” Journal of Creativity (2024).
  7. Hong H, Vate-U-Lan P and Viriyavejakul C. “Cognitive Offload Instruction with Generative AI: A Quasi-Experimental Study”... Forum for Linguistic Studies 7.7 (2025).
  8. Hwang Y and Hwang J. “The Effect of Generative AI on Design Students’ Critical Thinking and Creative Achievement”. in Chang, C.-Y., Chen, C.-H., & Hsu, Y. (eds.), IASDR 2025: Design Next, 02-05 December, Taipei, Taiwan (2025).
  9. Keito Inoshita., et al. “Does AI Homogenize Student Thinking? A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Structural Convergence in AI-Augmented Essays (2026).
  10. Iqbal J., et al. “Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement”... Scientific Reports (2025).
  11. Jose B., et al. “The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion”. Frontiers in Psychology 16 (2025): 1550621.
  12. Lee HPH., et al. “The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking”. Microsoft Research (2025).
  13. Lodge JM and Loble L. “Artificial intelligence, cognitive offloading and implications for education”. University of Technology Sydney (2026).
  14. Risko EF and Gilbert SJ. “Cognitive offloading”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20.9 (2016): 676-688.
  15. Robin Vivian. “Artificial Intelligence as the Last Invention of Humanity: Disruption, Co-Creation, and Implications”. Revue CSSE 3.1 (2026).
  16. Robin Vivian. “The Twilight of Human Genius: AI and the Redefinition of Creativity”. PriMera Scientific Engineering 7.5 (2025): 07-16.
  17. Rudolph J, Tan S and Tan S. “War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education”. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6.1 (2023).
  18. Stadler M., et al. “Cognitive ease at a cost”... Computers in Human Behavior (2024).
  19. Xie Y and Xie Y. “When artificial intelligence makes everything similar”... Journal of Chinese Sociology (2026).
  20. Zhou Y., et al. “Creative scar without generative AI: The homogenization effect”... Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2025).