PriMera Scientific Engineering (ISSN: 2834-2550)

Literature Review

Volume 5 Issue 5

Critical Evaluation of The Science Technology and Innovation Policy in the UAE: an Insight into its Implementation in Education

Elsawah Wafaa*

October 30, 2024

DOI : 10.56831/PSEN-05-162

View PDF

Abstract

This paper examines the United Arab Emirates' Science Technology and Innovation (STI) policy, particularly its impact and application within the educational sector, as the nation transitions from a resource-based to a technology-driven economy. Utilising a vertical methodological approach, the study begins by contextualising the STI policy before comparing it with those of other nations, and then deeply analysing its specific application and implications in education. The findings reveal that while the UAE has successfully integrated STI into its educational framework, thereby progressing towards Vision 2021, several challenges persist. These include the need for a more structured implementation process, an undefined role for teachers in this transformative journey, and the neglect of demand factors within the educational system. Despite these gaps, the policy has aligned the UAE with global competitiveness standards and fostered an innovative environment. The paper concludes that although the STI policy has significantly transformed the educational landscape, driving innovation and technological advancement, it requires further refinement. To achieve deeper and more sustainable impacts, the policy must incorporate a comprehensive implementation framework, enhance teacher capabilities, and address the demand factors of education. By refining these elements, the UAE can better tailor its educational system to meet the objectives of the STI policy and prepare for future challenges, thereby reinforcing its position in the global economic landscape.

Keywords: STI policy; education; technology; innovation; policy evaluation

References

  1. Al Murshidi GH and Wright E. “Using ICT and Digital Tools in Teacher Professional Development in the UAE”. In Global Perspectives on Teacher Performance Improvement, IGI Global (2022): 232-247.
  2. Alblooshi HA and May L. “Engaging women to study STEM through empowerment: A case from the United Arab Emirates (UAE)”. In 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference (2018): 1-5.
  3. Anagnostopoulos D, Rutledge SA and Jacobsen R. “The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education”. Harvard Education Press (2018).
  4. Anderson D. “Impact of Science, Technology and Innovation on Educational Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis”. International Journal of Educational Development (2018).
  5. Asfarina A, Marjohan M and Ahmad R. “The Effectiveness of Content Mastery Services with Internet-Based Problem Based Learning Models in Enhancing Student Critical Thinking Skills”. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education 3.1 (2019): 55-58.
  6. Bartlett L and Vavrus F. “Transversing the vertical case study: A methodological approach to studies of educational policy as practice”. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 45.2 (2014): 131-147.
  7. Beers S. “STEM Education: Preparing for the Jobs of the Future”. SSRN Electronic Journal (2014).
  8. Bereiter C. “Education and mind in the knowledge age”. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2002).
  9. Colombage S. Harnessing science, technology and innovation for sustainable development (2019).
  10. Elsawah W and Charles T. “Investigating Emirati Students’ Practices of Learning Block-Based Programming in an Online Learning Context: Evidence from a UAE National Program”. In BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2022: Multidisciplinary Studies, 131-142. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland (2023).
  11. Forward W. Technology Integration in UAE Schools (2013).
  12. Goncharenko N and Gamarli R. Mechanisms of state support for innovation in the PRC in the context of its innovative development (2020).
  13. Gupta B and Agarwal R. “Strategic Performance Measurement System and Its Impact on Organizational Effectiveness: A Study of United Arab Emirates Based Organizations”. European Journal of Business and Management Research 7.3 (2022): 266-276.
  14. Hameed I., et al. “Science, technology and innovation through entrepreneurship education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)”. Sustainability 8.12 (2016): 1280.
  15. Hameed I., et al. “Science, technology and innovation through entrepreneurship education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)”. Sustainability 8.12 (2016): 1280.
  16. Kim L. “South Korea's Science, Technology and Innovation Policies: Evolution and Impacts”. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation (2017).
  17. Kim Y and Choi S. “Integrating innovation and technology in South Korea's education system”. Education and Information Technologies 25.5 (2020): 3453-3470.
  18. Knezek G and Christensen R. The evolving role of technology in education. Educational Technology and Society 23.2 (2020): 1-16.
  19. Mengaliyevna NS and Qizi XSM. “Characteristics and Steps of Using Technology for The Development of Critical Thinking in Students”. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies 2.03 (2022): 60-70.
  20. Mishra P and Koehler MJ. “Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge”. Teachers College Record 108.6 (2006): 1017-1054.
  21. Mohamed SS, Al Barghuthi NB and Said H. “An analytical study towards the UAE universities smart education innovated approaches”. In 2017 IEEE 19th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 15th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 3rd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (2017): 200-205.
  22. Nematovna IG. Methods and technologies of the development of students’ creative abilities. Lifelong education: lifelong learning for sustainable development 2.13 (2015): 269-271.
  23. Ng PT. “Singapore’s Education System: The Path to Becoming a Learning Nation”. Journal of Educational Change 20.3 (2019): 309-323.
  24. OECD. “Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection”. PISA, OECD Publishing (2015).
  25. OECD. “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030”. OECD Publishing (2018).
  26. Papaspyridis A and Zalan T. “Accelerating innovation in the UAE: the 3i framework”. In Global Opportunities for Entrepreneurial Growth: Coopetition and Knowledge Dynamics within and across Firms, 355-391. Emerald Publishing Limited (2017).
  27. Paul A. “Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy 2013: Objective Assessment”. Prepare@ u®| General Preprint Services (2019).
  28. Pressman JL and Wildavsky A. “Implementation”. University of California Press (1973).
  29. Rogers EM. “Diffusion of innovations”. Free Press of Glencoe (1962).
  30. Sabatier P. “Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis”. Journal of Public Policy 6.1 (1986): 21-48.
  31. Sahlberg P. “FinnishED Leadership: Four Big, Inexpensive Ideas to Transform Education”. Corwin Press.
  32. Schleicher A. “PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations”. OECD Publishing (2019).
  33. “Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in the United Arab Emirates”. UAE Government (2015).
  34. Scott CL. “The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century?”. Education Research and Foresight, UNESCO (1999).
  35. Selwyn N. Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity (2019).
  36. Tondeur J., et al. “A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies”. Computers and Education 157 (2020): 103956.
  37. UAE Government. “Science, Technology and Innovation Policy”. UAE Government Publications (2015).
  38. UAE Vision 2021. “UAE Vision 2021 National Agenda”. UAE Government Publications (2010).
  39. Zheng B and Warschauer M. “Learning in the digital age: ICT integration and implications for schools”. Cambridge Journal of Education 51.1 (2021): 103-122.