PriMera Scientific Engineering (ISSN: 2834-2550)

Review Article

Volume 4 Issue 4

The VITO(pn 20150100457, 2015) Novel Training Kit to Limit Down the Learning Curve of Upper GI Endoscopy: Endoscopic Hemostasis

Constantinos S Mammas* and Adamantia S Mamma

March 28, 2024

View PDF

Abstract

The VITO(pn 20150100457, 2015) is a novel training kit that has been designed to be portable, light, mobile, and non-expensive, adjusted to the clinical needs of both beginners and advanced surgeons allowing a continuous and systematic self-centered and/or collaborative training in Surgical Endoscopy. The VITO(pn 20150100457, 2015) assisted endoscopy training kit impact on the learning curve in terms of the ‘’machine learning curve’’ which refers to the training process and computation of the time point considered as that, that an endoscopic operation is learned in the training process of Endoscopic Hemostasis is initially evaluated.

Keywords: Human System Interaction; Training Kit; Surgical Endoscopy; Machine Learning Curve; Endoscopic Hemostasis

References

  1. Jonathan Cohen and Irving M Pike. “Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy”. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015): 1-2.
  2. Maged K Rizk., et al. “Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures”. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015): 3-16.
  3. Walter G Park., et al. “Quality indicators for EGD”. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015): 17-30.
  4. Douglas G Adler., et al. “Quality indicators for ERCP”. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015): 54-66.
  5. Sachin Wani., et al. “Quality indicators for EUS”. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015): 67-80.
  6. RH Steadman., et al. “Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills”. Crit Care Med 34.1 (2006): 151-157.
  7. Ensuring competence in endoscopy Prepared by the ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy.
  8. “Quality indicators for GI endoscopic procedures complete set”. Gastrointest Endosc 81 (2015): 1-80.
  9. Frank J Chapman., et al. “Guidelines for safety in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit”. Gastrointest Endosc 79 (2014): 363-372.
  10. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy units Video GIE 2.6 (2017): 119-140.
  11. “Methods of Privileging for New Technology in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy”. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999): 899-900.
  12. Ashley L Faulx., et al. “Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy”. Gastrointest Endosc 85 (2017): 273-281.
  13. Steven O Ikenberry., et al. “Endoscopy by nonphysicians”. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009): 767-770.
  14. Simon M Everett., et al. “Informed consent for GI endoscopy”. Gastrointest Endosc 66 (2007): 213-218. Reviewed and reapproved (2014).
  15. Rajeev Jain., et al. “The role of endoscopy in enteral feeding”. Gastrointest Endosc 74 (2011): 7-12. Reviewed and reapproved (2016).
  16. Joo Ha Hwang., et al. “The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage”. Gastrointest Endosc 80 (2014): 221-227.
  17. Joo Ha Hwang., et al. “The role of endoscopy in the management of acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding”. Gastrointest Endosc 75 (2012): 1132-1138.
  18. Norio Fukami., et al. “The role of endoscopy in gastroduodenal obstruction and gastroparesis”. Gastrointest Endosc 74 (2011): 13-21.
  19. Steven O Ikenberry., et al. “Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions”. Gastrointest Endosc 73 (2011): 1085-1091.
  20. Tamir Ben-Menachem., et al. “Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy”. Gastrointest Endosc 76 (2012): 707-718.
  21. Vinay Chandrasekhara., et al. “Adverse events associated with ERCP”. Gastrointest Endosc 85 (2017): 32-47.
  22. Dayna S Early., et al. “Adverse events associated with EUS and EUS with FNA”. Gastrointest Endosc 77 (2013): 839-843.