Abstract
Food fraud is commonly treated as an economic or labelling offence, although an economically motivated act can create an unanticipated food-safety hazard. This Mini Review examines the emerging food-fraud evidence relevant to Kenya, the pathways through which fraud threatens health and traceability, and the implications of the Food and Feed Safety Control Co-ordination Act, 2026. Kenyan studies have documented milk dilution and inhibitory substances, as well as species substitution in the meat value chain. Additional vulnerabilities affect alcoholic beverages, honey, edible oils, spices, coffee, cereals, fortified foods and packaged products, but nationally representative prevalence data remain scarce. Three controversies shape the field: whether fraud should be governed principally as food safety or economic crime; whether informal markets are uniquely vulnerable or merely more visible; and whether digital traceability and artificial intelligence can prevent fraud without verified physical testing. Kenya's new coordination framework provides an institutional opportunity, but coordination alone will not deliver food authenticity. Priority gaps include the absence of a national incident database, limited denominator-based surveillance, uneven authenticity-testing capacity, weak integration of commercial intelligence with public-health data, and inadequate measurement of economic burden. Future development should combine vulnerability assessment, intelligence-led sampling, tiered analytical methods, interoperable traceability, protected reporting and transparent risk communication. Kenya should therefore govern food fraud as a food-integrity problem at the intersection of public health, consumer protection and economic crime.
Keywords: food fraud; food integrity; economically motivated adulteration; food safety; traceability; Kenya; public health; regulation
References
- Barrere V., et al. “Food fraud vulnerability assessment: Towards a global consensus on procedures to manage and mitigate food fraud”. Trends Food Sci Technol 100 (2020): 131-137.
- Chaudhary V, Kajla P and Shobhit. “Food fraud”. In: Simões J, editor. Encyclopedia of Livestock Medicine for Large Animal and Poultry Production. Cham: Springer (2026): 502-510.
- Costa MJ, Pinto Moura A and Cunha LM. “A systematic review of food business operators’ perceptions regarding food fraud”. Trends Food Sci Technol 172 (2026): 105743.
- Ellis DI., et al. “A flavour of omics approaches for the detection of food fraud”. Curr Opin Food Sci 10 (2016): 7-15.
- Fragkos N, Bouzembrak Y and Erasmus SW. “The role of artificial intelligence in combating food fraud: A systematic literature review”. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (2026).
- Kechagias EP., et al. “A scoping review on digital technology-enabled food supply chain traceability for food fraud prevention”. Logistics 10 (2026): 184.
- Manning L. “Food fraud: Policy and food chain”. Curr Opin Food Sci 10 (2016): 16-21.
- Njaramba JK., et al. “Detection of species substitution in the meat value chain by high-resolution melting analysis of mitochondrial PCR products”. Foods 10 (2021): 3090.
- Njiru JM., et al. “Food fraud in selected sub-Saharan Africa countries: A wake-up call to national regulatory bodies to support enforcement and food safety”. Front Food Sci Technol 5 (2025): 1499271.
- Nyokabi SN., et al. “Milk quality along dairy farming systems and associated value chains in Kenya: An analysis of composition, contamination and adulteration”. Food Control 119 (2021): 107482.
- Pustjens AM., et al. “An analysis of the severity of food safety hazards in EU food fraud cases”. Foods 14 (2025): 4328.
- Shepherd D., et al. “The cost of food fraud in the UK: Measurement and implications”. J Econ Criminol 13 (2026): 100230.
- Shuping LS and Lebelo K. “Food fraud implications and regulatory challenges in South Africa: A review”. Foods 15 (2026): 1282.
- Spink J and Moyer DC. “Defining the public health threat of food fraud”. J Food Sci 76 (2011): R157-R163.
- van Ruth SM, Huisman W and Luning PA. “Food fraud vulnerability and its key factors”. Trends Food Sci Technol 67 (2017): 70-75.
- Wanjala GW., et al. “Prevalence of adulteration and inhibitory substances in raw and pasteurized milk marketed in Nairobi region”. Asian Food Sci J 3 (2018): 1-8.