PriMera Scientific Surgical Research and Practice (ISSN: 2836-0028)

Research Article

Volume 7 Issue 6

The Ankle Reborn: Unraveling the Biological Mechanisms of Cartilage Repair in Distraction Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis

Connor Wu and Gordon Slater*

May 30, 2026

DOI : 10.56831/PSSRP-07-267

View PDF

Abstract

Ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition where biological repair is often overwhelmed by mechanical stress, leading to progressive joint degradation and significant functional impairment in affected individuals. Distraction arthroplasty is a joint preserving procedure that uses an external fixator to unload the ankle joint, creating an environment conducive to natural healing processes. The clinical success of this procedure is driven by a fundamental shift in the joint’s biological environment, transforming it from a state of chronic inflammation and breakdown to one of regeneration and repair. The mechanisms include mechanical offloading, which halts cyclical damage and reduces catabolic signaling; altered joint mechanics through intermittent fluid pressure that stimulates nutrient diffusion and anabolic cell activity; and a molecular shift that creates an anti-inflammatory, pro-regenerative microenvironment. DA is a powerful intervention that co-opts biomechanical principles to initiate a biological healing response in the ankle, offering a viable alternative for patients seeking to preserve joint function.

Keywords: Ankle osteoarthritis; distraction arthroplasty; cartilage repair; biological mechanisms; joint preservation; mesenchymal stem cells

References

  1. Herrera-Perez M., et al. “Ankle Osteoarthritis Aetiology”. J Clin Med 10.19 (2021): 4489.
  2. Delco ML., et al. “Post traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: A distinct clinical entity requiring new research approaches”. J Orthop Res 35.3 (2017): 440-453.
  3. Amoako AO and Pujalte GG. “Osteoarthritis in young, active, and athletic individuals”. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 7 (2014): 27-32.
  4. World Health Organization. “Osteoarthritis.” Www.who.int, World Health Organization (2023). www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/osteoarthritis
  5. Sharma A., et al. “Anxiety and depression in patients with osteoarthritis: impact and management challenges”. Open Access Rheumatol 8 (2016): 103-113.
  6. Hintermann B., et al. “Total ankle replacement for treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis in elderly patients”. J Aging Res 2012 (2012): 345237.
  7. Ha TT, Madeley NJ and Senthil Kumar C. “Outcomes of total ankle replacement-Current evidence”. J Clin Orthop Trauma 48 (2023): 102327.
  8. Shaffrey I, Henry J and Demetracopoulos C. “An evaluation of the total ankle replacement in the modern era: a narrative review”. Ann Transl Med 12.4 (2024): 71.
  9. Nogod S., et al. “Ankle Arthrodesis: Indications, Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction”. Cureus 15.4 (2023): e37177.
  10. Eidmann A., et al. “Compensatory Movements of the Midfoot Joints Influence Gait Pattern After Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis”. Foot Ankle Orthop 10.2 (2025): 24730114251338848.
  11. Fragomen AT. “Ankle distraction arthroplasty (ADA): A brief review and technical pearls”. J Clin Orthop Trauma 24 (2021): 101708.
  12. Fragomen AT. “Ankle distraction arthroplasty (ADA): A brief review and technical pearls”. J Clin Orthop Trauma 24 (2021): 101708.
  13. Thun Itthipanichpong., et al. “Joint distraction for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis”. Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preserva tion 3.1 (2023): 100107.
  14. Fedonnikov Alexander., et al. “Rehabilitation Process Issues and Functional Performance after Total Hip and Knee Replacement”. Healthcare 9 (2021): 1126.
  15. Heinrichsohn Falk. “Cellular therapy, an autologous cellular point of care approach to satisfy patient needs”. Journal of Translational Science 3 (2017).
  16. Dixon T., et al. “Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need”. Ann Rheum Dis 63.7 (2004): 825-30.
  17. Ackerman IN., et al. “The projected burden of primary total knee and hip re placement for osteoarthritis in Australia to the year 2030”. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20 (2019): 90.
  18. Maredziak M., et al. “The Influence of Aging on the Regenerative Potential of Human Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells”. Stem Cells Int 2016 (2016): 2152435.
  19. Dabrowska S., et al. “Immunomodulatory and Regenerative Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Extracellular Vesicles: Therapeutic Outlook for Inflammatory and Degenerative Diseases”. Front Immunol 11 (2021): 591065.
  20. Ruijiao Tian., et al. “Revolutionizing osteoarthritis treatment: How mesenchymal stem cells hold the key”. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 173 (2024): 116458.
  21. Godoy-Santos AL., et al. “Pathophysiology of Posttraumatic Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Perspective”. Acta Ortop Bras 32.3 (2024): e282286.
  22. Herrera-Perez M., et al. “Ankle osteoarthritis: comprehensive review and treatment algorithm proposal”. EFORT Open Rev 7.7 (2022): 448-459.
  23. Robinson WH., et al. “Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis”. Nat Rev Rheumatol 12.10 (2016): 580-92.
  24. Eloy Del Rio. “Thick or Thin? Implications of Cartilage Architecture for Osteoarthritis Risk in Sedentary Lifestyles”. Biomedicines 13.7 (2025): 1650.
  25. Wojdasiewicz P, Poniatowski LA and Szukiewicz D. “The role of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis”. Mediators Inflamm 2014 (2014): 561459.
  26. Eda H., et al. “Proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1β and TNF-α, induce ex pression of interleukin-34 mRNA via JNK-and p44/42 MAPK-NF-κβ pathway but not p38 pathway in osteoblasts”. Rheumatol Int 31.11 (2011): 1525-30.
  27. Nashtahosseini Z., et al. “Cytokine Signaling in Diabetic Neuropathy: A Key Player in Peripheral Nerve Damage”. Biomedicines 13.3 (2025): 589.
  28. Lieberthal J, Sambamurthy N and Scanzello CR. “Inflammation in joint injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis”. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23.11 (2015): 1825-34.
  29. Sadik CD and Luster AD. “Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascades orchestrate leukocyte recruitment in inflammation”. J Leukoc Biol 91.2 (2012): 207-15.
  30. Londhe P and Guttridge DC. “Inflammation induced loss of skeletal muscle”. Bone 80 (2015): 131-142.
  31. EN Blaney Davidson, PM van der Kraan and WB van den Berg. “TGF-β and osteoarthritis”. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 15.6 (2007): 597-604.
  32. Z Zhang., et al. “The effects of different doses of IGF-1 on cartilage and subchondral bone during the repair of full-thickness articular cartilage defects in rabbits”. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 25.2 (2017): 309-320.
  33. Molnar V., et al. “Cytokines and Chemokines Involved in Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis”. Int J Mol Sci 22.17 (2021): 9208.
  34. Li H, Wang W and Wang J. “Mechanical Signal Transduction: A Key Role of Fluid Shear Forces in the Development of Osteoarthritis”. J Inflamm Res 17 (2024): 10199-10207.
  35. Charles J Malemud. “Inhibition of MMPs and ADAM/ADAMTS”. Biochemical Pharmacology 165 (2019): 33-40.
  36. Mukherjee A and Das B. “The role of inflammatory mediators and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the progression of osteoarthritis”. Biomater Biosyst 13 (2024): 100090.
  37. Apte SS. “Anti-ADAMTS5 monoclonal antibodies: implications for aggrecanase inhibition in osteoarthritis”. Biochem J 473.1 (2016): e1-4.
  38. Melching LI., et al. “The cleavage of biglycan by aggrecanases”. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14.11 (2006): 1147-54.
  39. Brown RD., et al. “Cytokines regulate matrix metalloproteinases and migration in cardiac fibroblasts”. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 362.1 (2007): 200-205.
  40. Maruotti N, Corrado A and Cantatore FP. “Osteoblast role in osteoarthritis pathogenesis”. J Cell Physiol 232.11 (2017): 2957-2963.
  41. Ren K., et al. “Glycosaminoglycan depletion lowers the crack resistance of articular cartilage under impact loading”. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 170 (2025): 107122.
  42. Han G., et al. “Glycosamino glycan depletion increases energy dissipation in articular cartilage under high-frequency loading”. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 110 (2020): 103876.
  43. Qi C and Changlin H. “Levels of biomarkers correlate with magnetic resonance imaging progression of knee cartilage degeneration: a study on canine”. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15.7 (2007): 869-78.
  44. Steinert AF., et al. “Major biological obstacles for persistent cell-based re generation of articular cartilage”. Arthritis Res Ther 9 (2007): 213.
  45. Rim YA, Nam Y and Ju JH. “The Role of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Senescence in Osteoarthritis Initiation and Progression”. Int J Mol Sci 21.7 (2020): 2358.
  46. Ramasamy TS, Yee YM and Khan IM. “Chondrocyte Aging: The Molecular Determinants and Therapeutic Opportunities”. Front Cell Dev Biol 9 (2021): 625497.
  47. Seidman AJ and Limaiem F. “Synovial Fluid Analysis”. [Up dated 2023 May 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing (2025).
  48. Djouad F., et al. “Transcriptional profiles discriminate bone marrow-derived and synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells”. Arthritis Res Ther 7.6 (2005): R1304-15.
  49. Chu G., et al. “The role of microenvironment in stem cell-based regeneration of intervertebral disc”. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10 (2022): 968862.
  50. Li G., et al. “Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: insight into risk factors and microstructural changes”. Arthritis Res Ther 15.6 (2013): 223.
  51. Yang YQ., et al. “The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ossification”. Int J Oral Sci 4.2 (2012): 64-8.
  52. Liu S., et al. “Cartilage tissue engineering: From proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines to osteoarthritis treatments (Review)”. Mol Med Rep 25.3 (2022): 99.
  53. Thun Itthipanichpong., et al. “Joint distraction for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis”. Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation 3.1 (2023): 100107.
  54. Teunissen M., et al. “The catabolic-to-anabolic shift seen in the canine osteoarthritic cartilage treated with knee joint distraction occurs after the distraction period”. J Orthop Translat 38 (2022): 44-55.
  55. Y Chen., et al. “Joint distraction attenuates osteoarthritis by reducing secondary inflammation, cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone aberrant change”. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 23.10 (2015): 1728-1735.
  56. Teunissen M., et al. “Enhanced Extracellular Matrix Breakdown Characterizes the Early Distraction Phase of Canine Knee Joint Distraction”. Cartilage 13.2suppl (2021): 1654S-1664S.
  57. M Teunissen., et al. “The catabolic-to anabolic shift seen in the canine osteoarthritic cartilage treated with knee joint distraction occurs after the distraction period”. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation 38 (2023): 44-55.
  58. Fragomen AT., et al. “Minimum distraction gap: how much ankle joint space is enough in ankle distraction arthroplasty?”. HSS J 10.1 (2014): 6-12.
  59. Xu Y, Zhu Y and Xu XY. “Ankle joint distraction arthroplasty for severe ankle arthritis”. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18.1 (2017): 96.
  60. Peng L., et al. “Harnessing joint distraction for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized analysis”. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11 (2023): 1309688.
  61. Sun HB and Yokota H. “Reduction of cytokine-induced ex pression and activity of MMP-1 and MMP-13 by mechanical strain in MH7A rheumatoid synovial cells”. Matrix Biol 21.3 (2002): 263-70.
  62. MH Li., et al. “Regenerative approaches for cartilage repair in the treatment of osteoarthritis”. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 25.10 (2017): 1577-1587.
  63. Choi MC., et al. “NF-B Signaling Pathways in Osteoarthritic Cartilage Destruction”. Cells 8.7 (2019): 734.
  64. Zhang K., et al. “Mechanosensory and mechanotransductive processes mediated by ion channels in articular chondrocytes: Potential therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis”. Channels (Austin) 15.1 (2021): 339-359.
  65. Anwesha Mukherjee and Bodhisatwa Das. “The role of inflammatory mediators and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the progression of osteoarthritis”. Biomaterials and Biosystems 13 (2024): 100090.
  66. Sanchez-Lopez E., et al. “Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression”. Nat Rev Rheumatol 18.5 (2022): 258-275.
  67. Watt FE., et al. “The molecular profile of synovial fluid changes upon joint distraction and is as sociated with clinical response in knee osteoarthritis”. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 28.3 (2020): 324-333.
  68. Zhang Y., et al. “CC chemokines and receptors in osteoarthritis: new insights and potential targets”. Arthritis Res Ther 25 (2023): 113.
  69. Sanjurjo-Rodriguez C., et al. “Gene Expression Signatures of Synovial Fluid Multipotent Stromal Cells in Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis and Following Knee Joint Distraction”. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8 (2020): 579751.
  70. Le H., et al. “Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration”. J Tissue Eng 11 (2020): 2041731420943839.
  71. Rivera JC and Beachler JA. “Distraction arthroplasty compared to other cartilage preservation procedures in patients with post-traumatic arthritis: a systematic review”. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 13.2 (2018): 61-67.
  72. Zhu X., et al. “Subchondral Bone Remodeling: A Therapeutic Target for Osteoarthritis”. Front Cell Dev Biol 8 (2021): 607764.
  73. Lin Z., et al. “Effects of BMP2 and VEGF165 on the osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells”. Exp Ther Med 7.3 (2014): 625-629.
  74. Makhdom AM and Hamdy RC. “The role of growth factors on acceleration of bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis”. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19.5 (2013): 442-53.
  75. Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A and Rodeo SA. “The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function”. Sports Health 1.6 (2009): 461-8.
  76. Haiyan Zhang., et al. “Mechanical overloading promotes chondrocyte senescence and osteoarthritis development through downregulating FBXW7”. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 81.5 (2022): 676-686.
  77. Slater GL, Javadian S and Mathen L. “A Review of Distraction Arthroplasty Vs Ankle Arthrodesis Vs Ankle Replacement”. J Regen Biol Med 4.1 (2022): 1-28.
  78. S Ali., et al. “Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty: A Survivorship Review and Meta-Analysis”. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 62.6 (2023): 996-1004.
  79. I Takahashi., et al. “Joint unloading inhibits articular cartilage degeneration in knee joints of a monosodium iodoacetate-induced rat model of osteoarthritis”. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 27.7 (2019): 1084-1093.
  80. Haelewijn N., et al. “Clinical and Biomechanical Progression after Ankle Joint Distraction in a Young Adolescent Patient with Haemophilia”. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18.21 (2021): 11405.
  81. Yang Z., et al. “Comparisons between ankle distraction arthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy for treatment of post traumatic varus ankle osteoarthritis”. BMC Surg 22.1 (2022): 178.
  82. Haleem AM., et al. “Short-term Results of Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty”. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 15.3 (2020): 157-162.
  83. Lineham B., et al. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Derived Cartilage Morphological Changes and their Correlation with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Knee Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis: A 12-Month Cohort Study”. Cartilage 4 (2025): 19476035251357836.
  84. Liu XN., et al. “Ankle distraction arthroplasty for the treatment of severe ankle arthritis: Case report, technical note, and literature review”. Medicine (Baltimore) 99.39 (2020): e22330.
  85. Zhao H., et al. “Functional analysis of distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis”. J Orthop Surg Res 12.1 (2017): 18.
  86. Costa FR., et al. “Orthobiologics Revisited: A Concise Perspective on Regenerative Orthopedics”. Curr Issues Mol Biol 47.4 (2025): 247.
  87. Ikuta Y., et al. “Clinical Outcomes of Distraction Arthroplasty with Arthroscopic Microfracture for Advanced Stage Ankle Osteoarthritis”. Foot Ankle Orthop 4.4 (2019): 2473011419S00228.
  88. Wang J., et al. “Effect of Distraction Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ankle Arthritis”. Orthop Surg 16.9 (2024): 2167-2172.