PriMera Scientific Surgical Research and Practice (ISSN: 2836-0028)

Editorial

Volume 5 Issue 3

An Editorial on Anosognosia in Mental Health: Why Recognizing Lack of Insight Is Crucial for Better Outcomes

Henry A Montero*

February 28, 2025

DOI : 10.56831/PSSRP-05-168

Abstract

Mental health conditions can appear in subtle and severe forms. Few challenges are as significant for patient care as anosognosia, which is the lack of awareness of one’s illness. Individuals with anosognosia genuinely cannot recognize that they have a psychiatric or neurological condition. This is not a matter of stubbornness or denial; rather, it stems from underlying neurobiological changes that affect self-awareness. The repercussions can include refusal of medication, early termination of therapy, relapses, and profound consequences to overall well-being.

Anosognosia affects up to 50% of people with bipolar disorder and over 60% of those with schizophrenia, yet it is frequently misunderstood or missed in clinical practice. Failing to recognize this phenomenon can lead to chronic nonadherence to treatment. Patients with anosognosia often believe they do not need help, requiring careful, evidence-based interventions to change their minds.

A Complex Diagnostic Picture

Diagnosing anosognosia can be complex due to its symptoms frequently overlapping with those of other severe mental illnesses. Sometimes, there is mild confusion or forgetfulness about the need for medication; in other cases, there is a refusal to recognize any problem. Tools such as the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) or neuroimaging methods (e.g. CT scans have assessed stroke-related impairments. However, no single diagnostic instrument is foolproof. Clinicians often rely on direct interviews, behavioral observations, and collateral information from family members or close friends.

Intervention and the LEAP-ON Model

One evidence-informed method of collaborating with patients experiencing anosognosia is adapted from the “LEAP” approach (Listen, Empathize, Agree, and Partner). This framework encourages clinicians to refrain from confrontation and instead focus on building rapport through empathetic listening. It entails validating the patient’s perceptions, even if they differ dramatically from clinical reality. The goal is not to prove the patient “wrong” but to earn trust and open pathways for collaboration.

An additional dimension— “ON,” or Open-to-resistance and Navigate patient’s decision—recognizes that patients with anosognosia might resist treatment but can still benefit from a carefully calibrated therapeutic alliance. By acknowledging a patient’s constructs—how they interpret events and experiences—clinicians can gently navigate decision-making without alienating the individual. The onus is on the therapeutic relationship to guide and support rather than to demand and coerce.

Balancing Legal and Ethical Considerations

There are instances when the severity of anosognosia and related mental health symptoms calls for more stringent measures, such as involuntary treatment. This step should be taken only after careful clinical judgment and compliance with local legal standards. While involuntary treatment can sometimes be lifesaving, it also carries ethical implications. The nuanced challenge is to protect the patient from harm while fostering a degree of autonomy that respects their dignity. Where possible, collaborative approaches and shared decision-making build greater trust and can reduce the need for coercive interventions.

Looking Ahead

Awareness of anosognosia is growing among mental health professionals, yet gaps in education and practice still exist. Persistent misconceptions—such as viewing refusal of treatment simply as “defiance”—risk hindering effective care. More widespread training in nuanced communication strategies and better integrating mental health services into primary care can help detect anosognosia earlier, improve patient adherence, and reduce relapse rates.

Individuals with anosognosia are not merely “in denial”; they face a profound neurological and psychological barrier to recognizing their conditions. By combining empathy, evidence-based strategies like LEAP-ON, and—if needed—legal safeguards, we can maximize treatment effectiveness and uphold the patient’s best interests. As we advance our knowledge of anosognosia and its intersection with various psychiatric and neurological disorders, forging a compassionate, patient-centered approach will remain crucial for achieving enduring improvements in mental health outcomes.

References

  1. Lysaker P., et al. “Insight in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Relationship with Behavior, Mood, and Perceived Quality of Life, Underlying Causes and Emerging Treatments”. World Psychiatry 17.1 (2018): 12-23.
  2. Montero H. “Anosognosia: How to Treat the Lack of Insight in Mental Health”. Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal 3.5 (2018): 1-4.
  3. Chao L and Kawasaki A. “Anosognosia: Delusions and Unawareness in Psychosis”. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 23.4 (2019): 256-264.