PriMera Scientific Medicine and Public Health (ISSN: 2833-5627)

Review Article

Volume 4 Issue 6

The 1mP1 Method: A Revolution in Hypnosis with Unparalleled Precision, Biolocalization, and Potential for Physiological Modification

Sebastian Cippitelli*

May 29, 2024

DOI : 10.56831/PSMPH-04-147


This study examines the 1mP1 method, an innovative hypnosis technique that prioritizes direct suggestion and the concept of organic biolocalization. In comparison to contemporary approaches of indirect suggestion, the 1mP1 method stands out for its emphasis on precision and detail during suggestion. It is theorized that the effectiveness rate of 1mP1 significantly surpasses conventional methods, aiming not only to influence the individual's mind but also to explore the possibility of structurally or functionally modifying organs and tissues. Potential applications include pain relief, immune system modulation, tissue regeneration, and anti-aging procedures. This method introduces a revolutionary approach in hypnosis, opening new perspectives in the treatment of various medical conditions.

Keywords: 1mP1 Method; Hypnosis; Hypnotherapy; Biolocalization; Direct Suggestion; Neurosciences; Clinical Hypnosis; Mind-Body Interaction; Psychophysiological Effects; Mind-Body Medicine


  1. Heap M. Hypnotherapy - a handbook (2nd ed.). Open University Press (2012).
  2. Mesmerism. Halls J Health 37.8 (1890): 169-171.
  3. Gomes Mda M and Engelhardt E. “Jean-Martin Charcot, father of modern neurology: an homage 120 years after his death”. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 71.10 (2013): 815-7.
  4. Bernheim H. “On suggestion: And its applications to therapy”. Paris: L’Harmattan. Psychological encyclopedia (2005).
  5. Dacquino G. “Psychoanalysis and hypnosis in theory and clinical practice (Sigmund Freud)]”. Minerva Med 73.45 (1982): 3207-3212.
  6. Kluft RP. “Freud's Rejection of Hypnosis, Part I: The Genesis of a Rift”. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 60.4 (2018): 307-323.
  7. Ahlskog G. “Clinical Hypnosis Today”. Psychoanalytic Review 105.4 (2018): 425-437.
  8. Lynn SJ and Kirsch I. “Theories of hypnosis”. Roles of the Psychologist 25.89 (2005): 9-15.
  9. Brooks, S. (n. d.). 31 Hypnosis Techniques (The Most Comprehensive List). British Hypnosis Research.
  10. Kraft WA and Rodolfa ER. “The Use of Hypnosis among Psychologists”. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 24.4 (1982): 249-257.
  11. Patterson DR and Jensen MP. “Hypnosis and clinical pain”. Psychological Bulletin 129 (2003): 495-521.
  12. Häuser W., et al. “The Efficacy, Safety and Applications of Medical Hypnosis”. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113.17 (2016): 289-296.
  13. Ullman M. “Herpes simplex and second degree burns induced under hypnosis”. The American Journal of Psychiatry 103 (1947): 828-830.
  14. Chapman LF., et al. “Changes in tissue vulnerability induced during hypnotic suggestion”. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 4.2 (1959): 99-105.
  15. Johnson EO., et al. “Functional neuroanatomy of proprioception”. J Surg Orthop Adv 17.3 (2008): 159-64.
  16. Xu Q and Grant G. “Course of spinocerebellar axons in the ventral and lateral funiculi of the spinal cord with projections to the posterior cerebellar termination area: an experimental anatomical study in the cat, using a retrograde tracing technique”. Exp Brain Res 162 (2005): 250-256.
  17. Watson C, Paxinos G and Kayalioglu G (Eds). The spinal cord. Academic Press, New York (2008).
  18. Carruthers G. “Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment”. Conscious Cogn 17 (2008): 1302-1316.
  19. Kröger S and Watkins B. “Muscle spindle function in healthy and diseased muscle”. Skeletal Muscle 11.1 (2021): 3.
  20. Matthews PB. “Where Anatomy led, Physiology followed: a survey of our developing understanding of the muscle spindle, what it does and how it works”. Journal of Anatomy 227.2 (2015): 104-114.
  21. Proske U and Gandevia SC. “The Proprioceptive Senses: Their Roles in Signaling Body Shape, Body Position and Movement, and Muscle Force”. Physiological Reviews 92.4 (2012): 1651-1697.
  22. Banks R. “Muscle Spindles and Tendon Organs”. Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences. Elsevier (2018).
  23. Cuoco A and Tyler TF. “Plyometric Training and Drills”. In J. R. Andrews, G. L. Harrelson, K. E. Wilk (Eds.), Physical Rehabilitation of the Injured Athlete (Fourth Edition). W.B. Saunders (2012): 571-595.
  24. Cobo JL., et al. “Searching for proprioceptors in human facial muscles”. Neuroscience Letters 640 (2017): 1-5.
  25. Wong JD., et al. “Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning?”. Journal of Neurophysiology 108.12 (2012): 3313-3321.
  26. Bernardi NF., et al. “Observing motor learning produces somatosensory change”. J Neurophysiol 110 (2013): 1804-1810.
  27. Ribot-Ciscar E and Ackerley R. “Muscle proprioceptive feedback can be adapted to the behavioral and emotional context in humans”. Current Opinion in Physiology 20 (2021): 46-51.
  28. Dimitriou M. “Enhanced muscle afferent signals during motor learning in humans”. Current Biology 26.8 (2016): 1062-1068.
  29. Hospod V., et al. “Changes in Human Muscle Spindle Sensitivity during a Proprioceptive Attention Task”. Journal of Neuroscience 27.19 (2007): 5172-5178.
  30. Umans BD and Liberles SD. “Neural Sensing of Organ Volume”. Trends Neurosci 41.12 (2018): 911-924.
  31. Cameron OG. “Visceral Sensory Neuroscience. Interoception”. Oxford University Press (2002).
  32. Vaitl D. “Interoception”. Biological Psychology 42 (1996): 1-27.
  33. Ceunen E, Vlaeyen JWS and Van Diest I. “On the origin of interoception”. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016): 743.
  34. Berntson GG, Gianaros PJ and Tsakiris M. “Interoception and the autonomic nervous system: Bottom-up meets top-down”. In M. Tsakiris & H. De Preester (Eds.), The interoceptive mind: From homeostasis to awareness. Oxford University Press (2018): 3-23.
  35. James W. “The consciousness of self”. In W. James, The principles of psychology, Henry Holt and Co 1 (1890): 291-401.
  36. Smallwood J and Schooler JW. “The restless mind”. Psychological Bulletin 132.6 (2006): 946-958.
  37. Vanhaudenhuyse A., et al. “Two distinct neuronal networks mediate the awareness of environment and of self”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23.3 (2011): 570-578.
  38. Esch T and Stefano GB. “Love promotes health”. Neuro Endocrinology Letters 26.3 (2005): 264-267.
  39. Seshadri KG. “The neuroendocrinology of love”. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 20.4 (2016): 558-563.
  40. Esch T and Stefano GB. “The neurobiology of pleasure, reward processes, addiction and their health implications”. Neuro Endocrinology Letters 25 (2004): 235-251.
  41. Surman OS and Baer L. “Massachusetts General Hospital Comprehensive Clinical Psychiatry”. En Massachusetts General Hospital Comprehensive Clinical Psychiatry. Elsevier (2008).
  42. Sun T and Walsh C. “Molecular approaches to brain asymmetry and handedness”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7.8 (2006): 655-662.
  43. Cippitelli S. “Cryonics, a Comprehensive Approach: The Use of Higher Temperatures and its Viability”. PriMera Scientific Surgical Research and Practice 3.2 (2024): 03-20.