Relationship between Neuroarchitecture and Stress Reduction Compared to Conventional Architecture in Healthcare Personnel
Mauricio Báez*, Sergio Camacho, Antonio Morante, Bersain Reyes and Miguel Fuentes
December 29, 2023
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of hospitals built with conventional architecture compared to those built using neuroarchitecture which is a branch of architecture that considers the impact of design on cognitive and emotional responses, particularly in relation to stress reduction. A device sensitive to skin impedance was used to measure symptoms of stress. A total of 28 participants were shown two videos, one featuring conventional architecture and the other showcasing neuroarchitecture. Additionally, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21) questionnaire was administered to assess the symptomatology of stress, depression, and anxiety. Significant differences in skin impedance were found between subjects exposed to Neuroarchitecture and Conventional Architecture environments. In the Tococirugía data, Neuroarchitecture showed an average impedance of 355 kΩ compared to 287 kΩ in the conventional environment. Similarly, in the UCIN data, Neuroarchitecture had an average impedance of 302 kΩ while the conventional environment had 230 kΩ. For the UTIN data, Neuroarchitecture exhibited an average impedance of 377 kΩ, whereas the conventional environment had 235 kΩ. The DASS-21 questionnaire results indicated higher levels of moderate stress (53.5%) compared to mild anxiety (46.4%) and mild depression (50%) among medical personnel in the evaluated clinical services.
References
- Osorio JE and Cárdenas Niño L. “Work stress: a review study”. Diversitas: Perspectives in Psychology 13.1 (2017).
- Thase ME., et al. “Utilizing the DSM-5 Anxious Distress Specifier to Develop Treatment Strategies for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder”. Academic Highlights. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2017).
- Villavicencio E. “Work overload is a product of the work culture that prevails in the country, as stated by Erika Villavicencio, a researcher at the highest school of studies”. En Breaking News (2022).
- Joshi K., et al. “Occupational Stress among Health Care Workers”. Submitted (2022).
- Schneiderman N, Ironson G and Siegel SD. “Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants”. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1 (2005): 607-628.
- Ghamari H., et al. “Neuroarchitecture Assessment: An Overview and Bibliometric Analysis”. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ 11.4 (2021): 1362-1387.
- García Espinosa S and García Aguilar AE. “Neuroarchitecture: A fertile field, beyond disciplinary boundaries”. Millennial, Science and Art 9.14 (2019).
- SR Kellert. "Building for health: Implications of neurobiological research for architectural design". Journal of Biourbanism 1.1 (2012): 5-18.
- RS Ulrich., et al. "A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design". HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 1.3 (2008): 61-125.
- Martinez RJ. “Application of the principles of neuroarchitecture for the design of a care center for those dependent on psychoactive substances in the province of Trujillo in 2019 (undergraduate thesis)”. Repository of the Private University of the North (2020).
- Guzmán Vergara DP. Psychologically Healthy Housing for More Human Cities: Natural Light in Exciting Spaces, an Approach from Neuroarchitecture. (Doctoral dissertation). Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Chile. (ProQuest Dissertations Publishing No. 30160018)12 (2022).
- Mora Atehortúa MP. Hospital Architecture, a Sensory Rebirth from Neuroarchitecture. Hospital Architecture: A Sensory Rebirth from Neuroarchitecture (Master's thesis). Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Faculty of Architecture, Architecture and Arts Program, Bogotá, Colombia (2021).
- Acosta Arista JM. Biophilic Architecture Criteria: an Option for the Well-being of Patients in the Inpatient Area of the Eleazar Guzmán Barrón Regional Hospital-Nuevo Chimbote] (Master's thesis) (2021).
- Tolsa MD and Malas O. “COVID-19: Psychological Impact, Risk Factors and Psychological Interventions in Healthcare Personnel”. Ibero-American Journal of Psychology and Health 12.2 (2021): 58-75.