Editorial
Volume 2 Issue 5
Sofica Bistriceanu*
March 29, 2023
DOI : 10.56831/PSMPH-02-056
Abstract
Disgrace means the loss of people’s respect as a response to the individual’s misconduct.
Personal acting up has various effects on the community and determines feedback; the error in practice outlines humiliation.
In the digital era, good and bad news rapidly spreads. Usually, people are curious and quickly respond to new info. The data spread about someone may be correct or false, including intentional or unintentional errors. The fast distribution of inaccurate data dangerously works on the equilibrium of the receiver, sender, and producer.
In the healthcare industry, individual medical errors rapidly circulate by media, commonly generating people to disapprove and censure the following behaviour. People's criticism increases the suffering in the heart and mind of an individual making mistakes; prolonged suffering can lead to disaster since the mind's activity influences bodily function, and fragile areas can decline their activities under excessive distress. Therefore, reputation must be ameliorated and recuperated quickly, whenever possible. Proper actions to rapidly establish the truth and collective support for health improvement may ease the torment.
Unintentional errors necessitate moderation in spreading data, compassion, and even forgiveness.
Minor to moderate unintentional errors may benefit from the community's emotional support; frequently, they explore the problem and consider the individual's past performance and successful activities completed before the error happens. Their actions during his troubled time express their inner voice toward him.
If this doesn't happen, he must reflect on his past acts to be sure if there are some possible gaps in effecting job requirements or relational problems; these potential breaches must be detected and corrected accordingly.
Their attitude of criticism or a lack of interest in him in troubled times will determine a similar response from him when they are in need.
Intentional errors must be identified and punished; minor to significant corrective and curative actions, according to error, will be used to avoid other misconduct with more people suffering.
Consciousness and more reflection on mistakes following undesired effects on the individual and community level are necessary. Through the power of a negative example, remediation is possible only using the image of such action, without any words or aggression.
Individuals with genetic abnormalities facilitating disapproval behaviour should be re-educated for improvement since each individual has an ineffable spark.
The people responsible for spreading misinformation must be punished, paying for moral distress to the intended recipient.
In this digital era, spreading bad news about an individual alters his credibility. Honour is essential for practical, successful work, and its alteration by lousy information shared wide affects personal health.
If an untruth is applied rapidly, a disaster could follow since affected personality traits for an innocent, not guilty person exponentially amplify his distress, leading to significant mental and physical disorders.
Verification for honest info before spreading prevents possible disasters.
Sometimes, envy subtly controls the envisioned steps to attain the intended goal. Such encounters are better to be identified and exposed to the public so as not to fall again someone.
The world includes a variety of individuals, and not all are gentle, honest people. Selective relationships for life quality improvement define us, ensuring ill prediction, termination, and rehabilitation of the individual.
People's successful relationships suppose truth, respect, and consideration. To work in dignity is a requirement, and the individual good morality and integrity assure esteem in the community.
Lack of respect and admiration from our community alters mind functioning and job performance and declines perspective.
Error is usual, but not exceeding limits for survival.